In re City of Stockton
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED1 OPINION REGARDING CONFIRMATION AND STATUS OF CALPERS2
KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge:
Resolving the single objection to confirmation of the chapter 9 plan of adjustment of debts by the City of Stockton necessitates answering the threshold question whether, as a matter of law, pension contracts entered into by the City, including the pension administration contract, may be rejected pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 365. 11 U.S.C. § 365.
After answering that question of law in the affirmative, we come to the main question: whether, as matters of law and fact, the City’s chapter 9 plan should be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto RicoUnited States District Court · 2019
- In re: City of Cle ElumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2026
- Kelley v. Safe Harbor Managed Account 101, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020