Legal Opinion

In re City of Stockton

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided February 27, 2015No. Case No. 12-32118-C-9PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED1 OPINION REGARDING CONFIRMATION AND STATUS OF CALPERS2

KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge:

Resolving the single objection to confirmation of the chapter 9 plan of adjustment of debts by the City of Stockton necessitates answering the threshold question whether, as a matter of law, pension contracts entered into by the City, including the pension administration contract, may be rejected pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 365. 11 U.S.C. § 365.

After answering that question of law in the affirmative, we come to the main question: whether, as matters of law and fact, the City’s chapter 9 plan should be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto RicoUnited States District Court · 2019
  3. In re: City of Cle ElumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2026
  4. Kelley v. Safe Harbor Managed Account 101, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API