Legal Opinion

Davis v. Astrue

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 2, 2008No. C 06-06108 MHPPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Re: Motions for Leave to Amend Second Amended Complaint and for Class Certification

MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Terrence Davis filed this putative class action against the Commissioner of Social Security on September 29, 2006. On December 19, 2007 Davis filed two motions before the court: 1) a motion seeking leave to file a Proposed Third Amended Complaint (“PTAC”), which would amend the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”); and 2) a motion for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. These two motions are now before the court. Having…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Diamond Foods, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  2. Feinman v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. Preap v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Di Lauro v. City of BurbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Graff v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API