Fricke v. Fricke
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The plaintiff has appealed from the action of the Superior Court in denying his motion to modify alimony and support, and in awarding counsel fees to the defendant. . .
The sole issue raised by the plaintiff in his appeal from the denial of his request for modification is whether the defendant’s employment subsequent to the rendition of the divorce decree constituted a substantial unforeseen change in circumstances not contemplated by the parties at the time of entry of the original decree which the trial court failed to consider in ruling on the motion.
A modification of alimony or support is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Sanchione v. SanchioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Grinold v. GrinoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- DECOSSY v. DeCossySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- North v. NorthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.