Gorman, Pros. Atty. v. Friedlander, Treas.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, PJ.
The question as so presented involves only the recent legislation as it provides for the distribution of the tax upon intangibles.
The right of the Legislature to levy and collect the tax is not challenged. The attack is directed solely to the right of the Legislature to provide for a distribution of such tax to the several counties of the state for local purposes, upon an unjust, inequitable, and unequal basis, which has no uniformity in its operation.
We now reproduce in full the schedule admitted to be a part of the pleading:
ADJUSTMENT OP THE UNDIVIDED CLASSIFIED TAX — MAY, 1932
The…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Friedlandbr v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State, Ex Rel. Hostetter v. HuntOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- State ex rel. Hostetter v. HuntOhio Court of Appeals · 1936