Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 2005Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I do not believe that the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies to bar Rita Far-ner’s (Claimant) petition to set aside the Compromise and Release Agreement by Stipulation (C & R Agreement) between Claimant and Rockwell International (Employer). In addition, I agree with Workers’ Compensation Judge Anne Colohan (WCJ Colohan) that Claimant provided a sufficient basis to set aside the C & R Agreement on grounds of mistake. Most important, I believe that, in reversing WCJ Colohan’s decision, the Workers’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Yonkers v. Donora BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. North Penn Sanitation, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Casinelli v. ManglapusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API