Farner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I do not believe that the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies to bar Rita Far-ner’s (Claimant) petition to set aside the Compromise and Release Agreement by Stipulation (C & R Agreement) between Claimant and Rockwell International (Employer). In addition, I agree with Workers’ Compensation Judge Anne Colohan (WCJ Colohan) that Claimant provided a sufficient basis to set aside the C & R Agreement on grounds of mistake. Most important, I believe that, in reversing WCJ Colohan’s decision, the Workers’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Yonkers v. Donora BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- North Penn Sanitation, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Casinelli v. ManglapusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.