Legal Opinion
State v. Edwards, 89823 (4-17-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 2008No. 89823Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant Morris Edwards appeals the consecutive sentence imposed by the trial court. He assigns the following error for our review:
"I. Morris Edwards was denied his liberty without due process and his right not to be subjected to punishment in violation of the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution by the imposition of consecutive sentences."
{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm Edwards' sentence. The apposite facts follow.
{¶ 3} The Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Edwards for one count of aggravated burglary and one…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Dawson, 88486 (6-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Velasquez, 88748 (8-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007