Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Sertic

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1914No. 2506PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division; William L.. Day, Judge. At Law. Action by Ivan Sertic against L. A. Cobb, receiver of the Columbian Hardware Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Per curiam

[1] The only question argued in this case either orally or in the briefs is one of jurisdiction of the court below; but the proceeding in this court is prosecuted upon assignments of error which embrace a number of questions concerning the merits of the cause. It follows that the case is rightly here and that this court may pass upon the question argued. Olds v. Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co., 195 Fed. 9, 11, 115 C. C. A. 91 (C. C. A. 6th Cir.); A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co., 195 Fed. 12, 15, 115 C. C. A. 94 (C. C. A. 6th Cir.); Smith v. Farbenfabriken of Elberfeld Co., 203…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Compton v. JesupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  4. Rouse v. LetcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hume v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. St. Bernard v. ShaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. McPherson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. Kingston v. MahoneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
  5. Loughnan v. HinesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API