Legal Opinion

Felling v. Giles

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 2001No. ED 78216PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Plaintiffs David Felling and Dennis Fitz-william appeal from the judgment entered on defendant Larry Giles’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of the defendant. 1 We affirm.

The defendant conducts a business having to do with artifacts from buildings scheduled for demolition. The plaintiffs alleged in their petition that they had undertaken to assist the defendant in salvage operations and that they were entitled to a share of the price received by the defendant when the artifacts were sold.

The first amended petition in the initial action between…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Madison Block Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. Jordan v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Corrigan v. Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly, Davis & DicusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Lay v. LaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. VulgamottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Patrick V. Koepke Construction, Inc. v. Woodsage Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Xiaoyan Gu v. Da Hua Hu, and ACE INA Insurance Company Canada, Defendants/Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Romeo v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API