Legal Opinion

O'SULLIVAN v. Conrad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1976No. 76-236PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

This is a suit for an injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant incorporated in a sales agreement. The agreement involved the sale of two ongoing optical facilities. By the agreement, defendant Raymond Conrad, seller, was to become an employee of plaintiff William O’SuUivan, buyer, and, in the event of the termination of the employment contract or any extension thereof, defendant agreed not to engage in a competing optical business within a radius of 75 miles from Herrin, Illinois, for a period of five years. On April 8,1976, a hearing on plaintiff s complaint for temporary and permanent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bauer v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Shaw v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Dill v. WidmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. The Vendo Co. v. StonerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Tarr v. StearmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Hydroaire, Inc. v. SagerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Russell v. Jim Russell Supply, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Sheehy v. SheehyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API