Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hundley v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 2015No. CV-14-650Published

1DissentPaul E. Danielson, Justice

I fully agree that Arkansas prisoners confined in out-of-state facilities under the Interstate Corrections Compact (“ICC”), Arkansas Code Annotated § 12-49-102 (Repl. 2009), must be afforded an avenue by which to seek habeas relief; however, I am simply unable to reconcile the majority’s analysis with our longstanding and well-settled case law. Because I tend to be more persuaded by the Alaska Court of Appeals’ decision in Harvey v. Antrim, 160 P.3d 673 (Alaska Ct.App.2007), and because Hundley did not also direct his petition to his custodian, his New Jersey warden, an agent of appellee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Strait v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cloird v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. State Department of Public Welfare v. Lipe ex rel. AtracnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API