Legal Opinion

Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Mahoney

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 29, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

Maine Bonding and Casualty Company (Company) instituted an action alleging negligence in the form of professional malpractice against the defendant attorneys at law. Defendants answered and filed motions, supported by affidavits, to dismiss for failure of the Company to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court, under Rule 12(b), M.R.Civ.P., treated the motions as if for summary judgment under Rule 56(b), M.R.Civ.P., and granted the motions. 1 The plaintiff’s appeal from this ruling is denied.

The premise upon which the negligence actions were based was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Rioux v. Franklin County Memorial HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Miller v. Southern Machine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schneider v. RichardsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Levasseur v. AaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Levasseur v. AaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API