Legal Opinion
Pinkney v. City of Jersey City Department of Housing & Economic Development
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 9, 2002No. 00-2378PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The complaint in this action was filed by Steven Pinkney, who claimed to act pursuant to a general power of attorney on behalf of plaintiffs Danielle Pinkney, his adult daughter who is allegedly mentally incompetent, and Michael Hammock, his brother-in-law. Plaintiffs asserted that the defendants violated the HOME Investment Partnership Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12701 et seq., in connection with plaintiffs’ closing on a mortgage for the purchase of a home in Jersey City, New Jersey. They requested damages of $300,000.
By Order entered June 30, 2000, the District Court dismissed the complaint sua…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Tse-Ming Cheung, M.D. v. Youth Orchestra Foundation of Buffalo, Inc., Anne Luchsinger, John Potts, and Ansgarius AylwardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Robert Collinsgru Maura Collinsgru, on Behalf of Their Son, Francis Collinsgru v. Palmyra Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
4Cited by21 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Kickham, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
- C.P., D.P., and Sharita Patterson v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- GIBSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- HARLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- HARLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.