Legal Opinion

Div. of Pensions v. Lindeman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 25, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

103 N.J. Super. 375 (1968)

247 A.2d 354

DIVISION OF PENSIONS, PLAINTIFF,

v.

HARRY W. LINDEMAN, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided October 25, 1968.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for plaintiff (Mr. William J. Brennan, III, appearing).

Messrs. Stickel, Kain and Stickel, attorneys for defendant (Mr. Harold M. Kain, appearing).

HERBERT, J.S.C.

Both parties seek a declaratory judgment. Although the action might have been brought in the Law Division, there has been no motion to transfer. In all respects counsel have cooperated admirably to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGee v. Board of Trustees of Public Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Jacobs v. NJ STATE HIGHWAY AUTHORITYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Ehrlich v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API