Sidney v. A. S. Beck Shoe Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.
The plaintiff, an actress of some prominence, charges the defendant with having published her photograph for advertising purposes, without her written consent. The defendant pleads three partial defenses in mitigation of damages. This motion was made to strike out all three. In her brief and on the argument plaintiff withdrew objections to the first and second partial defenses, which limits consideration to the third.
The bases for this defense are the allegations that a general custom exists in the theatrical profession, whereby persons in it permitted and encouraged the use of their pictures…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bradner v. . FaulknerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Riddle v. . MacFaddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Harris v. H. W. Gossard Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Wyatt v. WanamakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Wyatt v. WanamakerNew York Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lane v. F. W. Woolworth Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Roberts v. Condé Nast Publications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955