Legal Opinion

State v. Smedberg

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1976No. 7618SC532PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

We note first that in their brief defendants have improperly-discussed matters which are not set forth in the record. We will not consider “facts” or other matters not supported by the record on appeal. 4 Strong, N. C. Index 3d, Criminal Law § 158.

The sole question presented for review is whether § 13-12 (14) (b) of the Greensboro City Code violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Section 13-12 provides in pertinent part:

“(a) Subject to the provisions of this section, the creation of any unreasonably loud, disturbing, and unnecessary noise in the city is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. GEUSSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Victory Cab Co., Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Desperados, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Wenco Management Co. v. Town of CarrboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API