Cramer v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RELINQUISHING JURISDICTION
KELLY, Judge.
David Cramer appeals from his convictions for possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and escape. He argues that he was deprived of due process because the trial court failed to make an independent find- mg that he was competent to proceed to trial. We agree and relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Before trial, two court-appointed experts submitted written reports indicating Cramer was competent. At a hearing that followed, defense counsel stated the experts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Ronald Pak Zern v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Roman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moulton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Golloman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Carrion v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Mansfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Dantzler v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.