Legal Opinion

Brown v. Bergman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

-The principal question is whether the boundary in question has been fixed by acquiescence, as defendant claims. The plaintiff and the defendant Fred W. Bergman are the owners of adjoining quarter sections, that, of .the plaintiff being the northwest,' and that • of the defendant the southwest quarter of the section. The-disputed boundary is, of course, the. east and west line between these quarters. For the sake of brevity, Fred W. Bergman will be considered as sole defendant. His father acquired the southwest quarter about 1890. There was at that time, and has ever since been, on the same…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Brown v. BridgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. Dwight v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Arneson v. SpawnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tewes v. Pine Lane Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Minear v. Keith Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Hart v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Sieck v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. United States v. WilcoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API