Pattridge v. Youmans

Defendant in error Youmans, who was plaintiff below, had judgment for $2,068.07 based on verdict of jury in an action for fraud in which it was alleged that plaintiff in error Pattridge, who was defendant below, sold Youmans a lot which he did not own, which fact was not discovered by Youmans until he had built a house thereon, and which house was then cláimed and occupied by the true owner of the lot; Request was made that we dispose of the matter on application for supersedeas, in which reversal -is sought.

Plaintiff in error’s assignments may be summed up in three propositions: 1. Violation…