Legal Opinion

FRIEDMANN v. COMMISSIONER

United States Tax Court

Decided August 7, 2001No. 17486-96UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY FRIEDMANN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

FRIEDMANN v. COMMISSIONER

No. 17486-96

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2001-207; 2001 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 240; 82 T.C.M. (CCH) 381;

August 7, 2001, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Gary Friedmann, pro se.

Keith L. Gorman and George D. Curran, for respondent.

Whalen, Laurence J.

WHALEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

WHALEN, JUDGE: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in, additions to, and penalties with respect to petitioner's Federal income tax for 1989 and 1990:

Additions to Tax Penalties

Year…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Wichita Term. El. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Tokarski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  3. Hradesky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Frank J. Hradesky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Beard v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seaview Trading, LLC, Agk Inve v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. Harold (In re Harold)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  3. Seaview Trading, LLC, Agk Inve v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. HaroldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. Seaview Trading, LLC, AGK Investments, LLC, Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API