Legal Opinion

Manhattan State Bank v. McLaren

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1923No. 24,097PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by the Manhattan State Bank to recover upon a promissory note for $8,750, and to foreclose a mortgage on real estate executed by George McLaren and his wife, *539Alice H. McLaren, to secure the payment of the note. Judgment was given against the makers of the note for the amount due thereon and for the foreclosure of the undivided interest owned by George Mc-Laren and his wife about which there was no question, subject to a life estate in the defendant Catherine Charlotte McLaren. It was further determined that the deed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gribben v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Odom v. . RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Lack ex rel. Scudder v. BrechtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Waller v. JuliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Abbott v. CrealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nevin v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Mills v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. First National Bank v. KallashSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. George Nevin, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Viola M. Nevin, an Incompetent Person v. Jay A. Hoffman and Hazel I. Hoffman, His Wife, George Nevin, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Viola M. Nevin, an Incompetent Person v. Jay A. Hoffman and Hazel I. Hoffman, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API