Ward v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. The trial court did not err in giving the flight instruction under the circumstances of this case. See Payne v. State, 541 So.2d 699, 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The constitutional challenge to the 1989 amendment of the habitual offender statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), has been decided adversely to appellant in Pittman v. State, 570 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Barber v. State, 564 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Appellant could have been sentenced as an habitual offender under section 775.084 as it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Pittman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992