Legal Opinion

Nicholas & Shepard Co. v. Horstad

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1906Published

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hamlin County. Hon. George H. Marquis, Judge. Action by the Nichols & Shepard Company against Johannes Horstad and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

On this appeal the reversal of a judgment for respondent and new trial is sought in an action to enforce payment of $3,808, as the price and freight charges agreed upon for the purchase and delivery of a complete steam threshing outfit manufactured by respondent- corporation and ordered by appellants on the 21st day of May 1903, to- be shipped to them, on or about July 15th of that year, from Battle Creek, Mich., to the village of Bryant, in care of M. R. Baskerville, the representative of respondent, through the agency of whom the sale was effected. In the written order appellants agreed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. . CorliesNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Mendell v. WillyoungAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API