Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Murphy v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 15, 2008No. 2883061Published

1Concurring in the judgmentHaley, J.

I write separately because I believe the majority’s opinion creates needless uncertainty in the law governing plea agreements. Is a criminal defendant legally bound by any of the terms of his plea agreement before the agreement is presented to and accepted by the trial court? Before today, the answer to this question was a straightforward no. Now it is a more nebulous maybe. However, I agree that the majority reaches the correct result, albeit for the wrong reason, because, in my view, Code § 18.2-262’s grant of transactional immunity applies only to witnesses who give compelled testimony.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Moyer Reed Plaster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Gosling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API