Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cooper-Snell Co. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1919No. Claims Nos. 1549-A and 1688-APublished

Motions by claimant for orders vacating and setting-aside orders dismissing claims and to restore the claims to the calendar.

1DissentAckerson, P. J.

I believe the motion to restore the above-entitled claims to the calendar of this court should be granted. I believe that the claim*104ant herein is entitled to have its day in court. These claims were regularly filed in this court and set forth that the claimant is entitled to a substantial amount of money for extra work and materials and for damages by reason of negligent engineering and inspection on the part of the State in connection with two highway contracts. No notices of intention were ever filed as required by section 264 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The claimant, however, endeavored…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ross v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API