Legal Opinion

Central-Penn National Bank v. Tinkler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1944No. Appeal, 175PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below making absolute plaintiff’s rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. On the 13th day of March, 1941, defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff an agreement of suretyship, under seal, by which “in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) to the undersigned in hand paid . . ., the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby”, he agreed to become surety to the plaintiff for “any and all negotiable or non-negotiable instruments now,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rynier EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brereton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Continental Bank v. AxlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  4. Keystone Bank v. Flooring Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Rexnord, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API