Legal Opinion
Atkins, In re
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 1992No. 91-35938Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
979 F.2d 854
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re Roger M. ATKINS; Joyce Atkins, Debtors.
Ronald A. WATSON, as Trustee of the Estate of Roger M.
Atkins and Joyce J. Atkins, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RAGEN, TREMAINE, KRIEGER, SCHMEER & NEILL, an Oregon
Partnership; Davis, Wright & Tremaine, an Oregon
Partnership, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-35938.
United States Court of Appeals,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Begier v. Internal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Bullion Reserve of North America, a California Corporation, Curtis B. Danning, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Theodore P. BozekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Kolinsky v. Russ (In Re Kolinsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.