Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. Broad River Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 10, 1924No. 15530PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
Under the facts of this case and the ruling in Lanier v. Bailey, 120 Ga. 878 (1) (48 S. E. 324), the court did not err in directing a verdict for the claimant. See, in this connection, Williams v. Herrington, 12 Ga. App. 77 (1) (76 S. E. 757); Baughman Automobile Co. v. Emanuel, 137 Ga. 354 (73 S. E. 511, 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 97).
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. Hamilton McWhorter Jr., for plaintiff. Irvin & Fortson, for defendant.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baughman Automobile Co. v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Lanier v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Williams v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Poss Bros. v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Hardin Lumber Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Jonas v. Central Georgia Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926