Legal Opinion

Haight v. Salter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 73, Calendar No. 36,495PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff was vendee, by assignment, of land contract dated January 30, 1924, executed by defendants as vendors, and in which they represented that they owned the land. In fact, they were contract purchasers from Coe, who had mortgaged the premises to Smitherman.

The contract required the vendors to execute and deliver to the vendee a warranty deed, free from incumbrances except those arising from vendee’s acts or default, on receiving payment in full and surrender of the contract.

The contract payments of $7 per month were made with unusual, although not strict, regularity, only one payment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cossett v. O'RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re William Terrell and Tammy Terrell, Debtors. William Terrell and Tammy Terrell v. Eugene Albaugh, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Moyer v. Edlund (In Re Vandenbosch)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Darr v. Clevelin Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Ellwood v. NiedermeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API