Legal Opinion

Alker v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 5, 1931No. 114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents-a point which has. been already ruled a number of times, always against the taxpayer, with one exception. Wilmington Trust Co. v. U. S., 28 F.(2d) 205 (D. C. Md.). The plaintiffs’ position is -that the repeal by section 1400 of the Revenue Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 320) of title 4 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1096) did not preserve taxes upon the estates of those who died within a year of the date when the Act of 1921 took effect. This is because the tax was not due for a year and did not therefore “accrue” until after the repeal, which saved only “accrued” taxes.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Flannery v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Page v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1928
  5. Hodgkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Clarion Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Ewbank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. Burrows v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Standard Oil Co. of California v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API