Legal Opinion
Heuser v. Kephart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 30, 2000No. 98-2233Published
1Opinion of the Court
215 F.3d 1186 (10th Cir. 2000)
ANTHONY HEUSER AND NONA HEUSER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FRANK KEPHART;FARMINGTON UTILITY SYSTEM; JACK MCQUITTY, Code Compliance Officer; STEPHEN HRZICH, City Electrical Inspector, City of Farmington; JAMES CHEVERIE, ROGER LASATER, SAN JUAN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 98-2233
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, TENTH CIRCUIT
June 30, 2000
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO (D.C. No CIV-95-257-MV/LCS)Debra D. Poulin, Santa Fe, New Mexico, (Richard Rosenstock, Santa Fe, New Mexico and Jeffrey J.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Robert Stewart v. Donald DongesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Louie Morris, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Hobart, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Louis E. FULGENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.