Legal Opinion

Beadling, Admx. v. Moore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1928No. Appeal 60PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

"We limit onr review to the only question involved as stated by appellant: “Whether, where collateral is deposited with an accommodation endorser to secure him on his endorsement, a failure to return the collateral upon the payment of the note on which he is endorser will be sufficient to sustain a finding of unlawful conversion without proof of demand of said collateral and refu'sal to return same.”

In 1920 the defendant, Moore, made his 60-day promissory note for $500 payable to Beadling, now deceased; Beadling endorsed it and Moore had it discounted by his bank and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heller v. FabelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Learock v. PaxsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. McBride's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Croft v. JenningsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Clowes v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. COLES v. SutphenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Spickler v. Lombardo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1977
  3. JTH TAX LLC v. FOSTERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API