Legal Opinion
Beadling, Admx. v. Moore
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 23, 1928No. Appeal 60PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
"We limit onr review to the only question involved as stated by appellant: “Whether, where collateral is deposited with an accommodation endorser to secure him on his endorsement, a failure to return the collateral upon the payment of the note on which he is endorser will be sufficient to sustain a finding of unlawful conversion without proof of demand of said collateral and refu'sal to return same.”
In 1920 the defendant, Moore, made his 60-day promissory note for $500 payable to Beadling, now deceased; Beadling endorsed it and Moore had it discounted by his bank and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heller v. FabelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Learock v. PaxsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- McBride's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Croft v. JenningsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Clowes v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- COLES v. SutphenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Spickler v. Lombardo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1977
- JTH TAX LLC v. FOSTERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023