Siegerist v. Blaw-Knox Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Walter L. Siegerist, Charles C. Litsch and the Medart Engineering and Equipment Company (Meeco), defendants below, appeal from the entry of an injunction in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri which found that they had infringed upon appellee Blaw-Knox Company’s right to the trademark “Medart” and had unfairly competed with Blaw-Knox. Blaw-Knox cross-appeals, asserting that it was entitled to an accounting. We refer to the parties by their status on the initial appeal, No. 19,365. We affirm, except with directions to modify the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sweetarts, a Corporation v. Sunline, Inc., and Menlo F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- National Rejectors, Inc. v. TriemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Fuller Products Co. v. The Fuller Brush CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Piper Aircraft Corporation v. Wag-Aero, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Pinnacle Advertising and Marketing Group Inc. v. Pinnacle Advertising and Marketing Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Litvak Meat Company v. George P. Baker, and Scott Truck Line, Inc., a Nebraska CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Big O Tires, Inc. v. BIGFOOT 4× 4, INC.District Court, D. Colorado · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.