Legal Opinion

Inamed Corp. v. Kuzmak

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 15, 2003No. 02-1477PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Inamed Corporation, Inamed Development Company, and Bioenterics Corporation appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California denying their motion for summary judgment on the seventh and eighth causes of action, and sua sponte granting summary judgment for defendants Lubomyr I. Kuzmak and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., on those causes. Inamed Corp. v. Kuzmak, No. 99-CV-2160 (C.D.Cal. May 29, 2002). We affirm.

I

The question presented in this appeal is whether a January 24, 2000, letter agreement between the parties…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spear v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horton v. MolinaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Horton v. MolinaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API