Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Middleton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.

This is an ejectment proceeding brought under R. S., Section 2155, as amended by the Acts of 1900, page 84, 1908, page 479, and 1918, page 71. Defendant and appellee, moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within 24 hours, and cites in support of that ground of his motion Act 49, p. 71, of 1918, and the case of State ex rel. Mallu vs. Judge, 128 La. 914, 55 South. 574. He urges as an additional ground to dismiss, that this court is without jurisdiction ratione materias et rationae personae.

The test of jurisdiction in ejectment suits is fixed by R. S., Section 2156.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Mallu v. Judge of Division D of Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tete v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Hooper v. HarperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API