Legal Opinion
Ardmor Vending Co. v. Kim (In re Kim)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1997No. BAP No. CC-96-1017-MeRuV; Bankruptcy No. LA95-26561-SBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge:
I
The debtors filed a Chapter 13 plan proposing to treat one creditor as only partially secured and another as wholly unsecured. The creditors objected to the plan contending that the debtors had undervalued the collateral securing their claims. The debtors responded by filing objections to the creditors’ claims. The bankruptcy court sustained the claims objections and confirmed the plan.
We AFFIRM.
II
FACTS
Peter and Esther Kim (“Kims”) operated a dry cleaning business. Ardmor Vending Co., dba Great Northern (“Great Northern”), and Ardmor Co. Profit Sharing Plan…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Robert Robinson, Trustee in Bankruptcy of D. C. Sullivan & Co., Inc. v. Watts Detective Agency, Inc., Daniel Sullivan, Billy R. OtteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jario A. MEJIA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Donald Taffi Madelaine Taffi, Debtors. Donald Taffi Madelaine Taffi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ardmor Vending Co. v. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Mary Ann RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024