Legal Opinion

State v. Seck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 2002No. 86,478PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

The defendant, Kenneth P. Seck, who was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by this court in 1995, attacks the constitutionality of K.S.A. 21-3824, a false impersonation criminal statute.

Seck, in appealing his misdemeanor conviction under K.S.A. 21-3824, contends the statute is vague and overbroad. We disagree. Seek’s conviction is affirmed.

Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 20-3018(c) (transfer from Court of Appeals on our own motion).

FACTS

In early December 1997, Stephen Rose, chairman and owner of Sun Publications, received the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. State v. EnglesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Enlow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. In Re SeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. State v. MellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. MesserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Commerce Bank, N.A. v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API