Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jonkman, Ex Rel. Shaw v. Striplin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1931No. Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 35,803Published

1ConcurrenceNorth, J.

As stated by Justice McDonald, the sticker ballot contained the full ticket for all of the offices. The ballot bore the name of a candidate for each of the seven village offices. Several of the names on the stickers were names of the identical candidates as printed on the official ballot. While the question is not raised in the instant case, it may well be questioned whether a single sticker covering all the offices on the ticket and in part duplicating the candidates’ names already printed on the ticket may lawfully be used. The statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 3111) provides only for writing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Anderson v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API