Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 2009No. Civil Action Nos. 08-00279 (HHK), 08-00722 (HHK). 08-01136 (HHK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Peter Ackerman and Joanne Leedom-Ackerman, husband and wife, bring these actions against the United States of America for refund of (1) income tax (Ackerman I, Civil Action 08-00279); (2) accuracy-related penalties (Ackerman IV, Civil Action 08-01136); and (3) failure-to-pay penalties (Ackerman III, Civil Action 08-00722), all for tax years 1997 through 2003, and all allegedly erroneously assessed under the Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”). The United States has moved to dismiss Ackerman I and Ackerman IV, and moved for partial dismissal of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Akinseye v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thompson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- Estate of Davenport v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Barber v. Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- ESTATE OF ROBERT F. ARMITAGE v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Thompson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011