In Re the Determination & Declaration of Heirs of Ho Chang Shee

There is nothing presented by the petition for rehearing of January 7, 1965 that was not considered by the court in reaching its decision of December 1, 1964 (48 Haw. 193).

Petitioners note that the four following cases were not cited in the briefs of the parties. In re Fink’s Estate, 343 Pa. 65, 21 A.2d 883; In re Bennett’s Estate, 135 Misc. 486, 238 N.Y. Supp. 723; Livernash v. DeLorme, 208 Mich. 295, 175 N.W. 177; In re Matthews’ Estate, 153 N.Y. 443, 47 N.E. 901. Consequently, it is contended, a rehearing with oral argument will give petitioners the opportunity to comment on and evaluate…