Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Toledo Municipal Court

Decided April 21, 1975No. Nos. MCR-74-14905, 14096, 15121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGabeibl, J.

This ease is before the court upon a motion to dismiss, the stipulated facts, the brief of defendant in support thereof and the answer brief of the prosecution in opposition thereto.

The defendant is charged with disorderly conduct under R. C. 2917.11 (A) (2), by an affidavit or complaint which states, in part, that “on or about the 9th day of November 1974 * * * one Richard C. Rose # * * did recklessly cause inconvenience and annoyance to persons in the Eranklin Park Mall in front of the Albert’s store by boycotting the said store and asking persons not to buy at their said store * #

This…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

State v. BurgunOhio Court of Appeals · 1976