Legal Opinion

In Re Melnick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1943No. 27034. Respondent disbarredPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

The committee on grievances of the Chicago Bar Association, as commissioners under Rule 59, has filed a report charging respondent with unprofessional, unethical, and dishonorable conduct, denoting a lack of good moral character and tending to bring the profession of law and the ¡courts of justice into disrepute and contempt. They recommend he be disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys. To this report the respondent has filed exceptions.

The report of the commissioners is based upon six separate complaints filed with the bar association by six different parties, all clients…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. LottermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. MeyerovitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. In Re BothIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People ex rel. Cline v. KerkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loui v. Board of Medical ExaminersHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re SchuylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re BrovermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API