Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Crane

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1922No. 4,654PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeals from District Court, Cascade County; E. E. Ewing, Judge. Action by L. H. Hamilton against J. A. Crane. From judgment for defendant and an order overruling his motion for new trial, plaintiff appeals. Cause submitted on briefs of Counsel.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reynolds

Plaintiff brought this action to recover from defendant, as his tenant, rent alleged to be due on a garage building in Great .Falls. The action was tried before the court sitting with *320a jury, and both special and general verdicts were rendered in favor of defendant. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdicts. Motion for new trial was made and overruled. Plaintiff has .appealed from the judgment and from the order overruling the motion.

A written term lease covering the premises had been pre[1] pared, but was never signed. The action was commenced upon the theory that the written…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doyle v. MullaneyMontana Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API