Legal Opinion

Kalamazoo Novelty Manufacturing Co. v. McAlister

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo Circuit. on the point that Kellogg could not hind defendant hy the certificate admitted in evidence, cited: Peek v. Detroit Novelty Works, 29 Mich., 313; National Bank v. Norton, 1 Sill, 579; Junction P. P. Co. v. Peeve, 15 Ind., 236; Ang. & Ames on Corp., § 277; Neale v. Burton, 4 Bing., 148; and on the point as to permitting the jury to take to the jury-room the hook: 1 Green Pr., 267; 1 Burr.

Read the full summary

Error to Kalamazoo Circuit. on the point that Kellogg could not hind defendant hy the certificate admitted in evidence, cited: Peek v. Detroit Novelty Works, 29 Mich., 313; National Bank v. Norton, 1 Sill, 579; Junction P. P. Co. v. Peeve, 15 Ind., 236; Ang. & Ames on Corp., § 277; Neale v. Burton, 4 Bing., 148; and on the point as to permitting the jury to take to the jury-room the hook: 1 Green Pr., 267; 1 Burr. Frac., 235; Neil v. Abiel, 24 Wend., 185; F. & M. Bk. v. Winch-field, Ibid., 419. on the admissibility of the certificate in evidence as an admission, cited: 29 Mich., 313;…

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, J:

Tbe company is a corporation, and McAlister, claiming; that it owed him a certain balance for services as superin*328-tendent, brought this suit to recover it. The alleged em- • ployment arose under a resolution of the directors, in these "terms: “Resolved that Mr. N. M. McAlister be appointed -superintendent of the Kalamazoo Novelty Manufacturing "Company -for the term of two years, provided he gives satisfaction to the 'company, at a salary of fifteen hundred 'dollars per annum.”

It appears also, that F. I. Kellogg, who was treasurer, 'Was constituted'“ consulting director,” “with whom…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farrell v. HazeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hardaway v. Consolidated Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Raish v. Orchard Canal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. People v. La LondeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Kalamazoo Novelty Manufacturing Works v. MacalisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API