Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Hall

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a new trial, a verdict having been directed for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

The defendant let one room to Eeavy & Shook, attorneys at law, for an office. They occupied it, but let desk room therein to the plaintiff by the month. There were no partitions; the office was in common, except that each desk had its place. The defendant took summary proceedings against Eeavy & Shook under the landlord and tenant act, and they were dispossessed by a city marshal under the final order. At the same time the defendant removed the desk of the plaintiff, and his few other small chattels, the marshal declining to do so because he was not a party to the proceeding; and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. MartinCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swart v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API