Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 11, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The single question requiring decision, on the merits, is the sufficiency of the affidavit upon which the capias ad respondendum was issued.

The affidavit, executed on January 5th, 1939, by Albert EL Hoffman, had annexed thereto an agreement between the prosecutor and respondents dated April 6th, 1937. By the terms of this agreement, respondents, as consignors, were to deliver to prosecutor “up to fifteen hundred (1,500) pair of shoes bearing the trade name of 'Friendly Shoes’ * * * to be kept there on consignment for the purpose of sale at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Polhemus v. MelidesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  2. Logan v. LawsheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  3. Brune v. MiskindSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Ferenga v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  5. Watson v. NoblettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allied Financial Corp. v. Steel Panel Sales Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Seiden v. FishteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Hamilton v. SchwadronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API