Legal Opinion

Remick Products, Inc. v. Mills

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 14, 1927No. 37PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This suit seeks a review, under sections 9 and 5, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA §§ 21, 14), of the aetion of the appellees in revoking appellant’s permit to use specially denatured alcohol in the manufacture of toilet *478and alcoholic preparations. It also sought injunctive relief, based on the claim of irreparable damages, due to unlawful acts on the part of the appellees in violation of the provisions of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). Act Oct. 28, 1919, c. 85, title 2, section 9 (41 Stat. 311 [27 USCA § 21]). Jurisdiction is dependent wholly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Vollmer Beverage Co. v. BlairDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elsinore Perfume Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Qualtop Beverages, Inc. v. McCampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. United States v. Anas Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928
  4. Triborough Chemical Corp. v. DoranDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
  5. De Milo Perfume Co. v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API