Legal Opinion

Perdomo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 2003No. 3D03-91PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals the order denying his motion for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He cites to Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000), and claims he is about to be deported based on a 1984 plea, where he was not informed of the immigration consequences of that plea. As previously observed, post-conviction relief is not available for the failure to advise a defendant of the immigration consequences of entering a plea prior to the time that the court was placed under a duty to render such an advisement. See Orellanes v. State, 790 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); State v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. State v. PaniaguaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Orellanes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodriguez-Grave v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API