Legal Opinion

Swan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 23, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the ruling of Judge of Probate, Penobscot county, State of Maine. At Supreme Court of Probate, appellee hied motion to have appeal dismissed. Motion was sustained, and the Justice presiding ordered appeal dismissed; to which ruling appellant filed exceptions. Case stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

From the decree of the Judge of Probate of Penobscot county allowing the final account of Mary E. Spencer, executrix of the will of Edward T. Spencer, the appellants seasonably took an appeal to the Supreme Court of Probate. They state in their appeal that they are interested as creditors of said estate, and that they are aggrieved by said decree. They allege the reasons of their appeal to be, in substance: (1) that said account so allowed contained an item of $6,468.10 paid by the executrix to the Sterns Lumber Co., which sum, as they contend, is less than half the amount of said claim, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Richter's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  3. Holmes v. FraserSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  4. Cantillon v. WalkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API