Legal Opinion

White v. Richmond

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This is a writ of error, reserved in Licking county, brought to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas of that county. The facts of the case, showing the questions involved, are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBirchard, C. J.

The action in the court below was assumpsit. *Plea, the general issue. On the trial, a bill of exceptions

was taken, which shows that, to maintain the issue on their part, the plaintiffs below, who sued as partners, offered in evidonce an instrument, of which the following is a copy :

Newark, April 30,1842.

“ §500.
“ For value received, we jointly and severally promise to pay Geo. M. Young or order, §500, in current funds of the State of Ohio. One moiety on the 1st day of November next, and the other moiety on November 1, 1843, with interest annually.
“ Joseph White. Erasmus White. Samuel White,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Miami v. DeedsOhio Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Snider's Exrs. v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Spoors v. CoenOhio Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State v. Wise, Unpublished Decision (8-16-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API