Legal Opinion
Arnett v. Gerber Scientific, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 30, 1983No. 83 Civ. 1051 (LFM)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Defendants Gerber Scientific, Inc. (“GSI”), Gerber Garment Technology, Inc. (“GGT”) and Camsco, Inc. (“Camsco”) move to dismiss the complaint against them and to drop them as parties. Plaintiffs allege claims under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2 (“Sherman 2”); Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18 (“Clayton 7”); Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b); and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; and the common law. Plaintiffs’ claims arise from the merger of Camsco with “Newco,” a wholly-owned subsidiary of GGT formed for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Harry Lewis v. Al KnutsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Bokat v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Harold DRACHMAN and Claire Drachman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lawrence A. HARVEY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v. Minorco, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Lower v. Lanark Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Keyser v. Commonwealth National Financial Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Fischer v. CF & I STEEL CORP.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.